Why QE will not solve the financial crisis

The current financial crisis is now entering its fifth year. No one seems to know how to solve it, which I find puzzling. The crisis was cause by two things: 1) Too much debt and 2) a flawed monetary system. The reason why I find this puzzling is that simply switching to a full reserve monetary system will solve both problems fairly quickly. Our current fractional reserve monetary system actually caused the crisis in the first place and makes the problem worse because fractional reserve systems are inherently un-stable.

My background is control systems engineering. I understand best strategies for controlling mechanical systems, I studied it and I spent many years putting it into practice, with good success. The cause of the financial crisis, and why it cannot be solved using our current (flawed) monetary strategy is obvious to me. In this article I will explain how why tinkering with our current system is a waste of time.

I will simplify the details below for the sake of clarity, the principals I describe will hold for the less simple case.

Too much debt
The money system in the UK, in simple terms, is made up of coins and notes (real money) and the balances in bank accounts (bank deposits, we shall call electronic money). Real money is created only by the bank of England. Electronic money is created by private banks (including the high street banks and building societies) when they make loans. About 97% of all sterling money is in the electronic form. We are highly dependent on money, without it the economy will grind to a halt. We are therefore highly dependent on electronic money (created by banks) because electronic money makes up almost our entire money supply.

Electronic money comes with a very high price, debt. When banks make loans they create new electronic money (as bank deposits) but they also create a matching debt  PLUS an additional debt, the interest due on the loan. So, when £10,000 of new electronic money is created into the money system free to be spent, a debt of £11,000 is also created (if the interest on the loan were 10% = £1,000). WHAT?

The financial crisis was caused by banks making too many loans, too quickly following the de-regulation of the banks in the 1970′s

The rapid increase in loans led to the rapid increase in money in the system but also, crucially, a rapid increase in the level of debt. For rapid, read EXPONENTIAL (Ref: 1 at the bottom). Is an exponential increase in debt, sustainable? No of course not. You do not need to be an engineer or a mathematician to see that, why the economic advisers to government also did not see this coming is a very good question.

A flawed monetary system
There is about £2,200bn of electronic money in circulation but about £2,500bn of matching debt. If we paid off all of our debts as advised by the prime minister, then there would be no electronic money in circulation and STILL £300bn of debt to pay off. This extra £300bn is interest payments owed to banks. The gap between money in the system and money owed to banks will simply get wider, thats compound interest at work.

We can never pay of our debts. And due to the effect of compound interest, we will keep getting further into debt FOREVER

The alternative to this upward debt spiral is to simply stop paying off your loan. This is called default. What happens if you stop paying your mortgage? you loose your house. What happens if you fail to pay your business loan? You loose your business and all the people working for you lose their jobs.

The fractional reserve money system currently operating in the UK is flawed. It flawed because electronic money can only be is created with a matching debt plus interest. This creates an upward debt spiral which is mathematically impossible to escape from due to the effect of compound interst. Anyone with a GCSE in mathematics and a few hours internet research time can demonstrate that our debt based  money system is flawed and needs to be replaced.

To answer the original assertion “Why QE will not solve the financial crisis”. Quantitative Easing give more money to the banks to encourage them to make more loans to businesses. How is this going to get us out of the upward debt spiral? Simple answer it won’t. What else won’t solve the crisis?

  • Credit easing. No. Too much credit got us into this mess in the first place
  • Helping business get better access to cheaper loans. No. More debt
  • Tax cuts. Best case scenario, it stimulate spending and we get a consumer led recovery. Hoorah? No! Rising consumer confidence means more borrowing and more debt and an acceleration of the upward debt spiral
  • Bringing forward public spending projects. No! more government debt, same problem
  • Pay off your debts, as advised by David Cameron. No! the money supply will shrink and even if we paid off all our debts, there would be no money left

These measures obviously do not work when more spending means more debt. If more spending did not result in more debt then they would work fantastically. This is why we need a full reserve system, where money is created, when it is needed, without creating more debt.

References
1. Have a look at the graph on this page, it shows how money in circulation growing with debt at an exponential rate (i.e. getting faster) and also note that the gap between debt and money in circulation is getting wider   http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2011/10/icb-leaves-inherent-shortcomings-system-fester/

Search the internet for ‘money reform’, ‘money as debt’ and don’t believe everything you read on wikipedia!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna has no idea how banks work

Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna spoke to Andrew Neil from Berlin about what the UK can learn about German banking practices. I have an interest in how banks work, how out money system works and why we are now entering our 5th year of un-necessary economic woes. As a business owner and citizen of this great country (the UK), I’m looking for a way to get us all out of this mess. I fear the government is in the dark on that one and unfortunately, the alternative government-to-be also have no idea.

According to Mr. Umunna, banks provide us with and I quote ‘somewhere we can store our money’. His response to Andrew’s question is on the BBC website. This is of course incorrect. When we deposit money in a UK bank, the bank takes ownership of the money. It’s no longer your money. The balance in your account is simply a promise of the bank to pay you the amount shown. The misconception, that when you put money in the bank, its still your money, is shared by a vast majority of people. Although I do expect our elected politicians to ‘get up to speed’ on key concepts before going on telly. I expect them to get up to speed on banking basics especially if they are the shadow business secretary, especially if they are charged with the important task to sort out our banking system by learning from best practice.

Is Mr. Umunna one of the new style career politicians who are not bothered about making the UK a great place to live? Is he being poorly briefed? Is he thick? He studied law, I would bet my shirt (not the nice Italian one though) he is not thick. What’s going on? I really do not have an answer to that one. How can you go investigate banking without doing a little internet research first? I have a full time job, hobbies and a social life and I found it easy enough! Rant over, sorry.

In case you think this stuff is difficult, its not. I know that our monetary system is flawed and need replacing with one that actually benefits the citizens of the UK. I met with my local MP and to be fair, he, as Mr.  Umunna, also had no idea how banks or our money system worked. Our politicians, love ‘em or hate ‘em are our elected representative and are the ones who can actually make the reforms to our money system and banks we need, so have a look at these you tube links and make an appointment to see the person who you and your neighbors voted in and EDUCATE them…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGkAFDKbBzo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQMd4k6XYLc

There is even draft legislation on here ….  http://www.positivemoney.org.uk

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Are bankers ‘reluctant, risk-averse jerks’ or just playing by the rules and making money?

I read an interesting piece on the BBC website  today in which Adam Posen, a member of the Banks of England’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) questions if ‘bankers were “reluctant, risk-averse jerks”, or if there was a more fundamental problem’. Well quite. Given the massive levels of profit these private companies (called ‘banks’) post and the huge salaries they pay themselves a casual observer would be forgiven for calling them businessmen of the highest calibre.

An a non-casual observer, the piece for me has a lot of important information missing. Firstly, banks have cut back their lending because they fear default. Banks will not lend if they think there is a risk of not getting back the loan principal. Theory goes that when banks have sufficient reserves they will lend and if the risk is higher then they will charge more interest. But look at it this way. Even if the interest rate is 30% and you don’t get your principal back ALL is lost. Banks do not lend if they fear default and injecting £200bn of QE did not encourage them to step up lending. The difference between theory and practice? In theory, there is no difference.

Secondly, banks prefer to lend on existing assets rather than lending to businesses. Why? If someone defaults on a loan for an existing asset, e.g. a mortgage, the bank simply re-possesses your house. Lending on existing assets makes more sense than lending to businesses – if you are a bank. This is borne out by the figures, approx 75% of loans are for mortgages to private individuals and 25% for helping business.

The piece goes on to ask if there are alternatives to get badly needed money to businesses. Wonder if the government has any ideas, it’s their job to govern? Anyway, not wanting to get sidetracked … With the current crisis, dubbed ‘The Great Recession’ entering its 5 year, The Independent Commission on Banking (ICB) spending years and slab-thick report suggesting better regulation and now the MPC with no real idea is it time to get the root cause fixed?

The root cause here is that banks prefer lend on existing assets to on real wealth creation schemes. Pumping cheap credit into mortgage lending pushes house prices up, creates housing price bubbles. This is not real wealth creation. Real wealth creation is small and medium sized businesses create new products, expanding production capacity, becoming more efficient by buying better machinery. This increases our capacity to sell abroad helping our balance of payments. This gets more people into jobs, earning money and spending it into the economy. This increases tax income to the government to build more hospitals and roads.

If the banks prefer to lend on existing assets rather than on wealth creating business loans then the rules that banks operate by need to be changed.

Leave a Comment

Filed under The Great Recession